Overcome Design Registration Objections with
Expert Response Filing
- Starting @
₹5,999
Only
90% Success Rate. Expert IP Attorneys. Designs Act 2000 Specialists. Complete Objection Handling.
Examination Report Analysis
Prior Art Search & Comparison
Novelty Statement Preparation
Amended Representation Filing
Legal Reply Drafting & Filing
Hearing Representation
FREE ConsultationGet Started @ ₹299 ₹0
Get Expert Consultation
Talk to our business executives in minutes
What Sets Us Apart
2,000+ Design Objections Handled
90% Success Rate
Expert Design IP Attorneys
0
Companies Incorporated
Successfully incorporated across India
0
Client Satisfaction
Rated excellent by our customers
0
Years of Experience
Serving businesses since 2020
0
Expert Consultants
Specialists in company formation
Testimonials
Hear What Our Customers Have to Say
India's one of the highest-rated legal tax and compliance guidance platform.
4.9 out of 5
(8521+ ratings)
Verified
Siddhu ManojFounder & CEO of Two-LYP Computations Pvt. Ltd.
“Incorporating my Startup with IncorpX was an incredibly smooth and hassle-free experience. The team was highly professional, guiding us every step of the way with clear communication and prompt support. The registration process was fast, and every detail was handled with precision and accuracy. Highly recommend IncorpX for anyone starting a business.”
Abhishek LohaniDirector at Lohani Learnings
“Company is good and service is also smooth. I used their compliance service and the response was timely with no delay and price are also convenient. They are always available to cater your need.”
Chandan Kr. ChaudharyFounder of Creative Minds
“I am very satisfied with the team of IncorpX for providing the top notch services. Team of IncorpX was giving the update on daily basis was one of the best thing which I experience in Corporate. keep doing it. Thank you!”
Jayavijaya SJFounder of Agro Farms
“Don't think twice.Got my company incorporates here. Tbh very impressed by the quality of service provided by this team. Very organized and friendly team. Had a smooth and peaceful experience. Timely regular updates were provided by the team. Overall a great experience.”
Anoop KrishnanFounder of EIGHTH DAY FORGE
“It's rare to find a service provider who makes the process feel personal - IncorpX absolutely did. From day one, they patiently explained every detail without any jargon, making it easy to understand and stress-free. There was zero chasing, no delays-just efficient, smooth execution all the way through. I felt supported, heard, and confident at every step of registering my company EIGHTH DAY FORGE (OPC) Private Limited. Thanks to Mr. Sriram and his wonderful team.”
Ramesh LankeFounder of EKnal Technologies
“IncorpX made the entire registration process for our company, EKnal Technologies, smooth and stress-free. Their team was professional, efficient, and incredibly supportive from start to finish. Highly recommend them to any founder looking for a reliable partner in their business journey! Special shoutout to Sriram and Aswin-your support, clarity, and responsiveness made the whole process incredibly smooth.”
700+
Businesses Incorporated Every Month
1000+
Ratings Trusted by 2000+ Clients
250+
Professional Network
Why Choose Us
Why Choose Us?
Expert Legal Team
Experienced legal experts in company formation and corporate law.
Fast Turnaround
Kickstart your venture with efficient company setup, generally processed within a week.
Dedicated Support
Personal manager by your side, every step of the way and beyond.
Complete Documentation
We handle all paperwork and ensure full legal compliance.
Business Growth Tools
Free business resources to fuel your company's success from day one.
24/7 Customer Service
Round-the-clock assistance for all your concerns.
Don't Let Objections Block Your Design Registration?
A design objection is not a rejection - it's an opportunity to present your case. Expert response drafting under the Designs Act 2000 can overcome most objections. Act before the deadline expires!
Simple Process
Here's How It Works
01
Fill the Form
Simply fill the above form to get started.
02
Call to discuss
Our startup expert will connect with you & complete legalities.
03
Overcome Design Objections Successfully
Our IP attorneys craft compelling replies to overcome Controller of Designs examination objections.
Pricing
Simple & Transparent Pricing
MOST POPULAR
Design Objection Reply Package
From ₹5999 one-time professional fee
Complete within 7 days
7-day turnaround 100% guaranteed
Examination Report Analysis
Objection Grounds Assessment
Prior Art Search & Comparison
Novelty Statement Preparation
Amended Representation Filing
Legal Reply Drafting
Evidence Compilation & Affidavits
Online Filing with Controller
Application Follow-up & Tracking
Hearing Support (if needed)
*Government fees are additional and vary based on company structure
4.9/5 based on 1000+ reviews
Money back guarantee
Secure payment
Top rated service
AI-Powered Platform
Meet IncorpX Nova
Our proprietary AI engine streamlines every step of business setup, from intelligent name suggestions to automated document drafting and compliance tracking.
AI-Powered Business Name Approval Check
Auto-Generated MoA & AoA Drafts
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring
3x Faster Processing Than Traditional CAs
24/7 AI Chatbot + Human Expert Support
NOVA AI
Premium Plan
IncorpX Prime
An all-inclusive solution for startups and expanding enterprises seeking a streamlined, compliant incorporation process.
Key Benefits
Personalised support from dedicated incorporation specialists.
Application prepared and filed within 2 days.
24/7 customer assistance.
Important Notes
We strive to register your preferred business name whenever feasible.
Alternative name suggestions are provided if the preferred name is not approved.
Package includes first-year compliance services: auditor appointment, annual filings, and related obligations.
A design objection is a formal notice issued by the Controller of Designs during the examination stage of a design application filed under the Designs Act, 2000. When the Controller finds that a design application does not meet the criteria for registration - such as lack of novelty, prior publication, functional nature, or inadequate representations - an examination report is issued to the applicant listing the specific grounds of objection.
The applicant must file a satisfactory design objection reply within 3 months from the date of the examination report (extendable by an additional 3 months). The response must address each objection with proper legal arguments, supporting evidence, amended representations where necessary, and references to relevant provisions of the Designs Act, 2000 and Design Rules, 2001.
Unlike trademark objections which have a strict 30-day deadline, the design objection process provides more time for preparing a thorough response. However, the technical and legal complexities of design law - particularly around novelty, originality, and the distinction between aesthetic and functional features - make professional assistance essential for a successful outcome.
At IncorpX, our team of experienced IP attorneys specialising in design law has successfully handled over 2,000 design objections with a 90% success rate. From examination report analysis and prior art search to legal reply drafting and hearing representation before the Controller, we provide end-to-end design objection reply services starting at just ₹5,999.
What is a Design Objection?
A design objection is raised by the Controller of Designs at the CGPDTM (Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks) when a design application filed under the Designs Act, 2000 is found to have deficiencies during examination. The Controller issues an examination report detailing the specific grounds why the design cannot be registered in its current form.
The examination process involves checking whether the design meets the statutory requirements under Section 4 of the Designs Act, 2000 - including novelty, originality, non-functionality, and conformity with public order. The Controller also verifies that the representations are clear, complete, and correctly classified under the Locarno Classification system.
Receiving an objection does not mean your design application is rejected. It is an opportunity to address the concerns raised by the Controller through a well-drafted response. Many design applications that initially face objections are successfully registered after a comprehensive reply is filed.
Key Aspects of Design Objection:
Examination-Stage Process:
Objections are raised during examination before registration, not by third parties.
Statutory Grounds:
Based on Designs Act, 2000 provisions - primarily Section 4 (novelty, originality, non-functionality).
3-Month Response Window:
Applicant gets 3 months (extendable to 6 months) to file a reply - more generous than trademarks.
Written + Oral:
Response is filed in writing; a hearing before the Controller may follow if needed.
Did You Know?
India registered over 16,000 designs in the financial year 2023-24, with approximately 25-30% of applications facing some form of objection during examination. Most objections relate to novelty and prior publication issues. With expert assistance, over 85% of objected applications achieve successful registration.
Common Grounds for Design Objection
Understanding the specific grounds helps in preparing a targeted and effective response. The Controller of Designs may raise objections under these provisions of the Designs Act, 2000:
Objection Ground
Legal Provision
Description
Response Strategy
Lack of Novelty
Section 4(a)
The design is not new - identical or substantially similar design already exists
Prior art search showing differences; detailed novelty statement
Prior Publication
Section 4(b)
The design was published or disclosed publicly before the application date
Prove application date precedes publication; challenge cited references
Not Original Design
Section 4
Design is a mere trade variant or insignificant modification of a known design
Demonstrate significant visual differences; expert opinion on originality
Functional Design
Section 4(2)
Design features are dictated solely by the function the article performs
Show aesthetic elements independent of function; alternative designs possible
Contrary to Public Order
Section 4(c)
Design involves scandalous or obscene matter, or is contrary to morality
Demonstrate legitimate artistic/commercial purpose; amend if possible
Improper Classification
Design Rules, 2001
Design is classified under the wrong Locarno Classification class
Request reclassification; provide correct class with justification
Inadequate Representations
Design Rules, 2001
Drawings or photographs are unclear, incomplete, or do not show all views
Submit amended representations with all required views and angles
Important Note!
Novelty objections under Section 4 are the most common and most challenging to overcome. A successful response requires thorough prior art research, detailed visual comparison charts, and a compelling novelty statement demonstrating how your design is significantly distinguishable from cited references. At IncorpX, our design IP specialists prepare comprehensive evidence packages that address each cited reference individually.
Types of Design Objections:
Design objections issued by the Controller of Designs can be broadly categorised into the following types based on the nature of deficiency. Each type requires a different response approach:
1. Formal Deficiency Objection
Issues with application form, incomplete details, missing documents, incorrect fees, or Power of Attorney deficiencies. These are the easiest to resolve through document submission.
2. Substantive Objection
Objections on merits - lack of originality, functional nature, or contrariness to public order under Section 4 of the Designs Act, 2000. Requires legal arguments and evidence.
3. Novelty Objection
The most common type - Controller cites prior art showing identical or similar designs. Response requires detailed comparison, novelty statement, and differentiation arguments.
4. Classification Error
Design is filed under the wrong Locarno Classification class. Requires reclassification request with proper justification for the correct class assignment.
5. Representation Quality Objection
Drawings, photographs, or CAD renderings are unclear, incomplete, or do not adequately represent the design from all required angles. Submit amended, high-quality representations.
How to Respond to Design Objections
Each type of objection requires a specific strategy. Here's how to effectively respond to the most common design objection types:
1. Responding to Novelty Objections (Section 4):
Conduct a comprehensive prior art search to identify all relevant references cited by the Controller
Prepare detailed side-by-side visual comparison charts showing differences between your design and cited prior art
Draft a statement of novelty highlighting the unique visual features, proportions, contours, and ornamentation
Include designer affidavits or expert opinions confirming the originality of the design
Reference case law where similar novelty arguments were accepted by the Controller or courts
2. Responding to Prior Publication Objections:
Challenge the cited publication date - prove your application date or priority date precedes it
Demonstrate that the cited publication shows a different design than what is claimed
If applicable, invoke the novelty grace period provisions under the Designs Act, 2000
Provide evidence of independent creation without access to the cited publication
3. Responding to Functionality Objections:
Demonstrate that the design features are aesthetic in nature, not solely dictated by function
Show that alternative designs can achieve the same function - proving aesthetic choice exists
Highlight ornamental elements, surface patterns, or contours that go beyond mere functionality
Submit amended representations emphasising the non-functional, visual aspects of the design
4. Responding to Representation Quality Objections:
Submit high-resolution amended representations with all required views (front, back, top, bottom, left, right, perspective)
Use professional CAD renderings or studio photographs with neutral backgrounds
Ensure consistency across all views and proper labelling of each representation
Design Objection Reply Process:
Our systematic process ensures comprehensive and timely responses to design examination objections:
Step 1: Receive & Analyse the Examination Report
Share the examination report from the Controller of Designs. Our IP attorneys analyse each objection ground, identify the legal provisions cited, and determine whether objections are formal or substantive in nature.
Step 2: Conduct Prior Art Search & Gather Evidence
Perform comprehensive prior art searches across Indian and international design databases, WIPO Global Design Database, and industry publications. Gather evidence including novelty comparisons, designer affidavits, and expert opinions.
Step 3: Prepare Amended Representations
If representation quality is an issue, prepare professional-grade amended drawings, photographs, or CAD renderings showing all required views with clear depiction of distinctive design features.
Step 4: Draft Comprehensive Legal Reply
Draft a detailed legal response addressing each objection with proper arguments under the Designs Act, 2000. Include evidence references, prior art differentiation, novelty statements, and supporting case law.
Step 5: Client Review & Filing
Share the draft response for your review and approval. After incorporating feedback, file the complete response package through the IP India online portal within the prescribed deadline.
Step 6: Attend Hearing (If Scheduled)
If the Controller requires further clarification, a hearing is scheduled. Our IP attorneys represent you before the Controller of Designs, presenting oral arguments and additional evidence.
Step 7: Receive Decision & Next Steps
The Controller issues the decision - accepting the design for registration or refusing it. If accepted, the design proceeds to registration. If refused, we advise on appeal options before the High Court.
90% success rate in overcoming design objections!
What Are the Documents Required for Design Objection Reply?
A thorough design objection reply requires comprehensive documentation to support your case before the Controller of Designs. Here are the documents typically required:
Document Category
Document Type
Purpose
Examination Report
Copy of objection notice from Controller of Designs
Reference document listing all objection grounds to be addressed
Original Application
Copy of filed design application with original representations
Baseline for comparison with amended representations
Amended Representations
Revised drawings, photographs, or CAD renderings
Address representation quality objections with clearer views
Novelty Statement
Written statement of novelty highlighting unique features
Establishes how the design is new and distinguishable from prior art
Prior Art Search Results
Search reports from Indian and international design databases
Demonstrates comprehensive analysis and differentiation from existing designs
Comparison Charts
Side-by-side visual comparison with cited prior art
Clearly shows visual differences to overcome novelty objections
Designer Affidavit
Sworn affidavit from the designer confirming originality
First-hand evidence that the design was independently created
Expert Opinion
Professional opinion from a design expert or academician
Independent assessment supporting the novelty and originality of the design
Power of Attorney
Form 23 - authorising the agent/attorney to represent
Legal authorisation for filing response on behalf of the applicant
Proves earlier filing date under the Paris Convention
Timeline & Deadlines for Design Objection Reply:
Understanding and adhering to deadlines is critical for the success of your design objection reply. Here are the key timelines:
Stage
Timeline
Details
Initial Response Deadline
3 months from examination report
Primary deadline to file written response with the Controller
Extension Period
Additional 3 months
Extension available on request before initial deadline expires
Maximum Response Time
6 months total
Maximum time from examination report to response filing
Controller Review
1-3 months after response
Controller reviews the reply and supporting evidence
Hearing (If Required)
2-4 months after review
Scheduled if written reply needs clarification or is insufficient
Final Decision
1-2 months after hearing
Controller issues order accepting or refusing the design
Appeal to High Court
Within prescribed time from refusal
If design is refused, appeal lies to the High Court
Total End-to-End Process
6-12 months typically
From objection receipt to final resolution (excluding appeal)
Critical Deadline!
Missing the 3-month response deadline (or 6 months with extension) results in automatic abandonment of your design application. Unlike some other IP proceedings, there is no restoration mechanism for abandoned design applications due to non-response. Contact IncorpX immediately upon receiving an examination report to ensure timely filing.
Design Cancellation Under Section 19:
Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000 provides a mechanism for cancellation of a registered design. While design objection occurs before registration during examination, design cancellation is a post-registration proceeding that any person can initiate. Understanding Section 19 is important because the grounds for cancellation overlap significantly with objection grounds.
Who Can File for Cancellation:
Any person - including competitors, designers, or the general public - can file a cancellation petition
The Central Government can also initiate cancellation proceedings in public interest
No requirement to demonstrate personal interest or locus standi - unlike trademark opposition
Grounds for Cancellation Under Section 19:
The design has been previously registered in India under a different application
The design was published in India or elsewhere prior to the date of registration
The design is not a new or original design as required under Section 4
The design is not registrable under the Designs Act, 2000
The design is not a "design" as defined under Section 2(d) of the Act
Cancellation Procedure:
File a cancellation petition with the Controller of Designs in the prescribed form with the requisite fee
The Controller serves notice on the registered proprietor, who files a counter-statement
Both parties submit evidence and the Controller conducts a hearing
The Controller issues an order - either cancelling the registration or dismissing the petition
Appeals against the Controller's order lie to the High Court having jurisdiction
Appeal Process for Refused Designs:
If the Controller of Designs refuses your design application after the objection reply and hearing, or if you are aggrieved by a cancellation order under Section 19, you have the right to appeal. The Designs Act, 2000 provides for appeals to the High Court against orders of the Controller.
Key Aspects of the Appeal Process:
1. High Court Jurisdiction
Appeals are filed before the High Court having jurisdiction over the Design Office (typically Calcutta High Court for the Kolkata Design Office).
2. Filing Deadline
The appeal must be filed within the prescribed time limit from the date of the Controller's order. Timely filing is essential - late appeals may be dismissed.
3. Grounds for Appeal
Errors in law, incorrect interpretation of Section 4, failure to consider evidence, procedural irregularities, or perverse findings of fact by the Controller.
4. Evidence & Arguments
Present detailed legal arguments, case law precedents, and fresh evidence (if permitted) before the High Court to challenge the Controller's decision.
5. Court's Powers
The High Court can set aside the Controller's order, direct registration of the design, remand the matter for reconsideration, or dismiss the appeal.
6. Supreme Court Appeal
In exceptional cases, a further appeal to the Supreme Court of India is possible through a Special Leave Petition (SLP) under Article 136 of the Constitution.
Benefits of Professional Design Objection Reply:
Why you should engage expert IP attorneys for your design objection reply:
Higher Success Rate
Expert replies with proper legal arguments and evidence have significantly higher acceptance rates than DIY responses - 90% success rate at IncorpX.
Thorough Prior Art Research
Comprehensive search across Indian and international design databases to build compelling differentiation arguments against cited references.
Legal Expertise
IP attorneys understand the nuances of design law under the Designs Act, 2000 and can craft arguments tailored to the Controller's expectations.
Timely Filing
We ensure your reply is filed well within the 3-month deadline, with proper documentation, so your application remains active and progresses.
Hearing Representation
Professional representation during hearings before the Controller of Designs, with oral arguments backed by solid legal precedents.
Protect Your Investment
Your design represents innovation and investment. Professional objection handling protects your design rights and prevents costly re-applications.
Don't lose your design to objections - act now!
Related Services You May Need:
IncorpX offers a complete suite of intellectual property services. Based on your design objection situation, you may also need:
Service
Description
When You Need It
Action
Design Registration
Register your industrial design under the Designs Act, 2000
Filing a new design application or after successful objection reply
Expert Team: Experienced design IP attorneys with Designs Act 2000 specialisation.
Track Record: 2,000+ design objections handled with proven results.
High Success: 90% objection clearance rate across all objection types.
Quick Response: Reply drafted and filed well within the 3-month deadline.
Hearing Support: Full representation before the Controller of Designs.
Affordable: Competitive pricing starting at ₹5,999 with no hidden fees.
FAQs on Design Objection Reply
Understanding the design objection reply process is crucial for protecting your industrial design rights. We've compiled answers to the most frequently asked questions about responding to examination report objections from the Controller of Designs under the Designs Act, 2000.
A design objection is a formal notice issued by the Controller of Designs under the Designs Act, 2000 when your design application fails to meet registration criteria during examination. The objection is communicated through an examination report citing specific grounds such as lack of novelty under Section 4, prior publication, or functional nature of the design. You must file a satisfactory reply to proceed with registration.
Common grounds include: (1) Lack of novelty - the design is not new under Section 4 of the Designs Act, 2000; (2) Prior publication - the design was disclosed publicly before the application date; (3) Not original - the design lacks originality or is a mere trade variant; (4) Functional design - the design is dictated solely by function under Section 4(2); (5) Contrary to public order or morality under Section 4(c); (6) Improper Locarno classification; (7) Inadequate or unclear representations.
The applicant must file a response within 3 months from the date of the examination report issued by the Controller of Designs. This deadline can be extended by a further 3 months upon request to the Controller, giving a maximum of 6 months total. Failure to respond within this period results in abandonment of the design application under the Design Rules, 2001.
Yes, unlike trademark objections, design objection deadlines can be extended. The initial deadline is 3 months from the examination report date. You can request a 3-month extension from the Controller of Designs, giving you a total of 6 months to file your response. The extension request must be filed before the initial 3-month period expires, along with the prescribed fee under the Design Rules, 2001.
Section 4 of the Designs Act, 2000 defines the conditions for registration of a design. A design must be:
New or original - not previously published in India or elsewhere
Not disclosed to the public before the priority or application date
Significantly distinguishable from known designs or combinations of known designs
Not purely functional - must not be dictated solely by the function of the article
Objections citing Section 4 require evidence of novelty and originality in your reply.
A design examination report is the official communication from the Controller of Designs at the CGPDTM (Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks) that lists objections found during examination of your design application. The report specifies the legal grounds for each objection, cites relevant sections of the Designs Act, 2000, and may reference prior art or published designs that conflict with your application.
To overcome a novelty objection under Section 4, you should: (1) Conduct a comprehensive prior art search to differentiate your design; (2) Prepare a detailed statement of novelty highlighting unique visual features; (3) Provide side-by-side comparison showing differences from cited prior art; (4) Submit amended representations emphasising distinctive elements; (5) Include expert opinions or affidavits supporting originality if available.
Evidence for a design objection reply typically includes: (1) Copy of the original examination report; (2) Amended or additional design representations (drawings/photographs); (3) Novelty statement with prior art comparison; (4) Results of prior art search from design databases; (5) Affidavits from designers or experts; (6) Expert opinions on originality; (7) Power of Attorney if filed through an agent; (8) Evidence of commercial success or market recognition of the design.
If the Controller of Designs is not satisfied with your written reply, a hearing may be scheduled where you can present oral arguments. If the design is still refused after the hearing, the application is rejected. You can then file an appeal before the High Court having jurisdiction within the prescribed time limit. The appeal must be filed with proper grounds and supporting documents under the Designs Act, 2000.
Design objection is raised by the Controller of Designs during the examination stage before registration. Design cancellation is a proceeding under Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000 that can be initiated by any person after registration to revoke the design right. Cancellation grounds include prior publication, lack of novelty, the design not being registrable under the Act, or the design being primarily functional.
The Controller of Designs is the government authority responsible for administering the Designs Act, 2000 and Design Rules, 2001 in India. The Controller functions under the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM), which operates under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. The Design Office is located in Kolkata with the Patent Office handling design examination across its branches.
Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000 allows any person (including the government) to petition the Controller for cancellation of a registered design. Grounds include:
The design was previously registered in India
The design was published prior to the registration date
The design is not a registrable design under the Act
The design is not new or original
The Controller hears both parties and may cancel the registration. Appeals lie to the High Court.
Yes, you can submit amended representations (drawings, photographs, or CAD renderings) as part of your objection reply, provided the amendments do not introduce new matter or substantially alter the identity of the design. Amendments typically include clearer views, additional angles, or highlighted distinctive features. The Controller evaluates whether amended representations overcome the objection while remaining consistent with the original application.
Prior publication means the design was made available to the public - through manufacture, sale, display at exhibitions, publication in magazines, catalogues, websites, or any other medium - before the priority date or application date. Under Section 4 of the Designs Act, 2000, a design that has been disclosed or published anywhere in the world before the application date is not considered new and cannot be registered. This is one of the most common grounds for design objection.
The total timeline depends on the complexity of objections: (1) Initial response deadline: 3 months (extendable by 3 months); (2) Controller review of reply: 1-3 months; (3) Hearing (if scheduled): 2-4 months after reply review; (4) Final decision: 1-2 months after hearing. Total process from objection to resolution typically takes 6 to 12 months. If you file an appeal to the High Court, additional 12-18 months may be needed.
The Locarno Classification is an international classification system for industrial designs maintained by WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). India uses this classification to categorise design applications into 32 classes covering articles ranging from foodstuffs (Class 1) to graphic symbols (Class 32). An incorrect classification in your application can be a ground for objection. The Controller may require reclassification as part of the objection reply.
Yes, design objection replies can be filed through the IP India online portal at ipindiaonline.gov.in. Upload the response document, amended representations, evidence, and supporting affidavits in the prescribed format. Physical filing at the Design Office in Kolkata is also accepted. Online filing is recommended for faster processing and immediate acknowledgment of submission.
IncorpX's design objection reply service starts at ₹5,999. This includes: examination report analysis, objection grounds assessment, prior art search, response strategy formulation, legal reply drafting with evidence compilation, amended representation preparation, online filing with the Controller, and follow-up until resolution. Hearing representation (if needed) and High Court appeal services are available at additional charges. Design registration packages are also available.
If the Controller of Designs refuses your application after the objection reply and hearing, you can file an appeal before the High Court having jurisdiction (typically the Calcutta High Court for the Kolkata Design Office). The appeal must be filed within the prescribed time limit from the date of the Controller's order. Grounds for appeal include errors in law, incorrect application of Section 4, or failure to consider evidence properly. The High Court can set aside the Controller's decision and direct registration.
Key differences include: (1) Design objections are governed by the Designs Act, 2000 while trademark objections fall under the Trade Marks Act, 1999; (2) Design objection reply deadline is 3 months (extendable to 6) vs. 30 days for trademarks; (3) Design objections focus on visual novelty and originality while trademark objections address distinctiveness and similarity; (4) Design examination is conducted by the Controller of Designs at Kolkata; (5) Appeals go to the High Court for designs vs. IPAB for trademarks.
Getting started is simple:
Share your design examination report with us
Our IP experts analyse the objection grounds and advise on strategy
We conduct a prior art search and prepare evidence
Draft a comprehensive legal reply with amended representations
File the response online with the Controller of Designs
Handle hearing representation if required
Track the application until final decision
Contact us today or visit our design registration page for end-to-end design protection.
The team was very responsive and helpful. I received daily updates from the WhatsApp group, and their guidance made everything much simpler to comprehend. If you want a simple and hassle-free way to launch your business, I would highly recommend them!
S
Simon Job
4.9/5
I recently used IncorpX to register my limited liability partnership, and I had an amazing experience! There were no hidden fees, and the team was helpful, quick to respond, and open. They provided thorough explanations of each step, and their services are reasonably priced without sacrificing quality. The entire process was made simple by IncorpX's professionalism, attention to detail, and sincere support. Strongly advised!
J
Jay R
4.8/5
The experience was flawless; the team completed each task with care and always responded quickly. Throughout the process, I never felt stuck. We would especially like to thank Saksham and Sriram for making everything run so smoothly! The IncorpX team offers extremely competitive pricing; anyone just starting out should definitely get in touch with them.
M
Mohammed Affan
4.9/5
I'm really grateful to the wonderful team at IncorpX for helping bring my co-founder's and my dream to life. The whole process was super smooth - fast service, great support, and no hassles at all. I'd highly recommend IncorpX to any new entrepreneur or founder looking to register their company. Excited to continue working with them in the long run. Thank you, IncorpX!
R
Riyom Taipodia
4.6/5
One of the best agency I have ever experienced. Team members are very friendly as if we know each other from before and came communicate and share easily. My work has been done in a very short period and I am so happy. Thank you so much.
A
Ayyappa Swamy
5/5
Highly recommend... IncorpX services regarding incorporation of our company and roc filing and all are very impressive.. the team IncorpX is polite and friendly. Our Lands Time pvt ltd has incorporated through IncorpX... And thanks to IncorpX team..
R
Ramesh Babu
4.9/5
Trouble free service, Rendering good co-operation for company incorporation. Trust worthy team to have better knowledge.
P
Pravesh Kudesia
5/5
IncorpX is providing best service... And user experience! Thank You IncorpX Team
B
Balaji Gutte
4.9/5
I recently got my Private Limited Company incorporated through IncorpX, and the experience was seamless! The team was professional, supportive, and quick to respond throughout the process. Highly recommend IncorpX for a smooth and stress-free company registration experience.
D
Dia
5/5
I'd been planning to register my Private Limited Company for months but didn't know where to start - until I found IncorpX. The team guided me step by step, explained everything clearly, and completed the registration smoothly within the promised timeline. Their pricing was transparent with no hidden charges. Highly recommend IncorpX to anyone starting a business!
Trusted by 15,000+ Entrepreneurs
Get Expert Guidance for Your Business
Fill out the form and our team will connect with you to understand your requirements and recommend the best way forward.
