Step-by-Step Guide 8 Steps

How to Respond to a GST Notice for ITC Mismatch (DRC-01 and ASMT-10)

Respond to GST notice for ITC mismatch (DRC-01, ASMT-10) with this step-by-step guide. Covers reply format, documents, penalties, and appeal process under GST

D
Dhanush Prabha
9 min read 84.6K views
Quick Overview
Estimated Cost ₹5000
Time Required 7 to 45 Days
Total Steps 8 Steps
What You'll Need

Documents Required

  • Copy of the GST notice received (DRC-01, DRC-01A, or ASMT-10) from the GST portal dashboard
  • GSTR-3B filed returns for all tax periods mentioned in the notice with ITC claim details
  • GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B statements downloaded from the GST portal for each disputed tax period
  • Purchase register with supplier-wise details including GSTIN, invoice number, date, and tax amount
  • Copies of all purchase invoices for which ITC has been claimed during the disputed period
  • Bank statements or payment proofs showing payments made to suppliers for the disputed invoices
  • Communication records with suppliers regarding pending GSTR-1 filings or invoice corrections
  • ITC reversal register showing reversals made under Rule 37, Rule 42, Rule 43, and Section 17(5)
  • Reconciliation statement comparing GSTR-3B ITC claims with GSTR-2A/2B available ITC

Tools & Prerequisites

  • GST portal login credentials (username and password) for the registered GSTIN at gst.gov.in
  • GST-compliant accounting software or Excel workbook for ITC reconciliation and mismatch analysis
  • Class 3 Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) or EVC for filing DRC-06 reply on the portal
  • PDF editor or document preparation tool for compiling the reply with supporting annexures

When the GST department detects a difference between ITC claimed in your GSTR-3B and ITC reflected in your GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B, they issue a notice asking you to explain the mismatch. This guide covers the complete process of responding to such notices, specifically DRC-01 (Show Cause Notice) and ASMT-10 (discrepancy notice). You will learn how to analyse the mismatch, categorize discrepancies, prepare a reconciliation statement, file your reply via DRC-06 on the GST portal within 30 days, attend a personal hearing, and file an appeal via APL-01 if a demand order is passed. The penalty for unresolved ITC mismatch ranges from 10% under Section 73 to 100% under Section 74, plus interest at 18% per annum.

  • Notice types -- DRC-01A (intimation), ASMT-10 (scrutiny discrepancy), DRC-01 (Show Cause Notice), DRC-07 (demand order)
  • Response deadline -- 30 days from the date of service for both DRC-01 and ASMT-10 notices
  • Reply form -- File DRC-06 on the GST portal with reconciliation statement and supporting documents
  • Penalty under Section 73 -- 10% of confirmed tax or ₹10,000 (whichever is higher); no penalty if paid within 30 days of SCN
  • Interest rate -- 18% per annum under Section 50 from the original return due date until payment
  • Appeal option -- File APL-01 within 3 months of DRC-07 order with 10% pre-deposit of disputed tax

What is a GST Notice for ITC Mismatch?

A GST notice for ITC mismatch is a formal communication from the Central or State GST authority issued when the Input Tax Credit you claimed in your GSTR-3B returns exceeds the ITC available in the GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B generated from your suppliers' GSTR-1 filings. The notice identifies the tax periods with differences, the specific mismatch amounts, and demands an explanation with supporting documents within a prescribed time limit.

The GST system automatically compares the ITC claimed by recipients (in GSTR-3B Table 4) against the ITC available from supplier data (in GSTR-2B). When the system detects a mismatch above the departmental threshold, the concerned officer initiates proceedings. The officer may first issue a DRC-01A intimation (an informal notice giving you an opportunity to pay voluntarily), followed by ASMT-10 (scrutiny notice for return discrepancy), or directly issue DRC-01 (Show Cause Notice) for significant mismatches. Each notice type has different implications, response formats, and consequences for non-response. Understanding which notice you have received is the first step toward preparing an effective reply.

ITC mismatch proceedings are governed by Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, read with Rules 142 to 161 of the CGST Rules. Scrutiny of returns is governed by Section 61. The ITC eligibility conditions are prescribed under Section 16(2), and the time limit for claiming ITC is under Section 16(4). All proceedings are conducted through the GST portal at gst.gov.in.

Types of GST Notices for ITC Mismatch

The GST department uses a graded approach when dealing with ITC mismatches. The notice type depends on the severity of the mismatch, the officer's assessment of intent, and whether earlier opportunities for voluntary compliance were exhausted. Understanding the hierarchy of notices helps you gauge the seriousness of your case and plan your response strategy accordingly.

Notice FormLegal ProvisionPurposeResponse FormResponse TimeConsequence of Non-Response
DRC-01ARule 142(1A)Intimation before SCN; opportunity to pay voluntarilyPay via DRC-03 or submit explanation on portalNo statutory limit; typically 15 days givenOfficer proceeds to issue DRC-01 SCN
ASMT-10Section 61, Rule 99Scrutiny notice for discrepancy in returnWritten explanation or acceptance with payment30 days from serviceMay escalate to Section 73/74 proceedings
DRC-01Section 73/74, Rule 142Show Cause Notice for tax demand, interest, penaltyDRC-0630 days from serviceEx-parte order via DRC-07 confirming full demand
DRC-07Section 73(9)/74(9), Rule 142(5)Final demand order after adjudicationAPL-01 (appeal)3 months from serviceRecovery proceedings via DRC-13 (garnishee) or DRC-16 (attachment)

DRC-01A: The Pre-SCN Intimation

DRC-01A was introduced to give taxpayers a chance to resolve ITC mismatches without formal proceedings. When you receive DRC-01A, the officer has identified a potential discrepancy but has not yet formed a case. You have two options: pay the disputed amount through DRC-03 (voluntary payment) along with applicable interest, or submit a detailed explanation on the portal explaining why the ITC claim is valid. If you pay the admitted amount and provide a satisfactory explanation for the remaining difference, the officer may close the matter without issuing a formal Show Cause Notice. Treating DRC-01A seriously and responding promptly is one of the most effective ways to prevent escalation.

ASMT-10: Scrutiny of Returns

ASMT-10 is issued under Section 61 when the officer scrutinises your returns and finds discrepancies. Unlike DRC-01, ASMT-10 does not directly demand tax or propose penalties. It asks you to explain the difference or accept and pay the differential tax. Your response to ASMT-10 is filed directly on the GST portal under the same case reference. If your explanation is accepted, the officer drops the matter and issues ASMT-12 (order of acceptance). If not satisfied, the officer may initiate formal proceedings under Section 73 or 74 and issue DRC-01. Responding to ASMT-10 with complete documentation significantly reduces the likelihood of formal proceedings.

DRC-01: Show Cause Notice

DRC-01 is the formal Show Cause Notice and carries the most serious implications. It specifies the exact tax amount the department believes has been short-paid due to the ITC mismatch, the applicable interest under Section 50, and the proposed penalty under Section 73 or Section 74. You must file your reply through Form DRC-06 within 30 days. The reply must address every point raised in the notice with supporting evidence. After reviewing your reply, the officer either drops the proceedings (if satisfied), schedules a personal hearing (for complex cases), or proceeds to pass an order. The order confirming demand is issued in DRC-07.

If you fail to respond to DRC-01 within 30 days and do not attend the personal hearing, the officer will pass an ex-parte order in DRC-07 confirming the entire tax demand, full interest, and maximum penalty. An ex-parte order is harder to challenge on appeal because the Appellate Authority may question why you did not respond at the first stage. Always file a reply, even if the reply is partial or seeks additional time.

Received a GST Notice for ITC Mismatch?

Our GST experts draft legally sound replies with complete reconciliation analysis, starting at ₹5,000.

Get Expert Notice Response

Common Reasons for ITC Mismatch Between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2B

Before you respond to a notice, you need to understand why the mismatch occurred. Each cause requires a different resolution approach and different supporting evidence. The GST department expects a cause-wise explanation in your reply, not a blanket denial. Based on our experience handling 2,500+ GST notice responses, these are the most frequent reasons for ITC mismatches.

Supplier Not Filing GSTR-1

The most common reason for ITC mismatch is the supplier collecting GST on invoices but not filing their GSTR-1 return. When a supplier does not file GSTR-1, the corresponding invoice data never reaches the GST system, and the ITC does not appear in the buyer's GSTR-2B. You may have legitimately received goods, paid the full invoice amount including GST, and claimed ITC in GSTR-3B based on the physical invoice, yet the ITC does not reflect in GSTR-2B. This situation creates a mismatch that is not your fault but requires specific documentation to defend. You need the purchase invoice, proof of payment, goods receipt note, and ideally a letter or email from the supplier confirming the transaction and their pending GSTR-1 status.

GSTIN or Invoice Errors in Supplier's GSTR-1

Suppliers sometimes enter the wrong buyer GSTIN, incorrect invoice number, or wrong taxable value in their GSTR-1. Even a single digit error in the GSTIN means the invoice credits another taxpayer's account instead of yours. Similarly, an invoice reported as ₹50,000 instead of ₹5,00,000 creates a massive ITC mismatch. These errors are visible when you compare your purchase register with GSTR-2B at the invoice level. The resolution requires the supplier to file an amendment in their next GSTR-1 correcting the buyer GSTIN or invoice details. Attach the original invoice, the GSTR-2B showing the error, and the supplier's confirmation of the correction in your reply.

Timing Differences Across Tax Periods

ITC timing mismatches occur when you receive an invoice and claim ITC in one month, but the supplier files their GSTR-1 reporting that invoice in a different month. For instance, you receive an invoice dated 28 March and claim ITC in your March GSTR-3B, but the supplier reports it in their April GSTR-1 (filed by 11 May). The ITC appears in your April GSTR-2B, not March. Over the financial year, these timing differences typically net to zero because the ITC eventually reflects. Prepare a month-wise reconciliation showing the cumulative match, and attach both months' GSTR-2B statements as proof.

Blocked ITC Claimed Under Section 17(5)

Section 17(5) of the CGST Act blocks ITC on specific categories of goods and services, including motor vehicles (with exceptions), food and beverages, outdoor catering, health services, cosmetic and plastic surgery, club memberships, travel benefits for employees, works contract for construction of immovable property, and goods used for personal consumption. If you claimed ITC on any blocked category, it creates a legitimate overclaim that you must reverse. The ITC may appear in your GSTR-2B (the supplier correctly reported it), but claiming it was incorrect. In your reply, accept the overclaim, reverse the ITC through DRC-03, and pay the applicable interest.

Based on our experience with 2,500+ GST notices, over 60% of ITC mismatches fall into the first two categories (supplier not filing or supplier errors). Before drafting your reply, run a vendor-wise analysis: list all suppliers contributing to the mismatch, contact each one, and document their response. Suppliers who confirm they will amend their GSTR-1 provide the strongest evidence for your reply. Maintain a supplier follow-up tracker with dates and outcomes.

Debit Notes and Credit Notes Not Matched

Debit notes issued by suppliers (increasing the original supply value) entitle you to additional ITC. Credit notes issued by suppliers (reducing the original supply value) require you to reverse the corresponding ITC. If the supplier issues a credit note but does not report it in their GSTR-1, the reversal will not reflect in your GSTR-2B, and any ITC you reversed voluntarily will create a favourable difference. Conversely, if a supplier reports a credit note you were not aware of, your GSTR-2B shows reduced ITC against your GSTR-3B claim, creating a mismatch. Reconcile your debit note and credit note register with GSTR-2B entries to identify these differences.

ITC Reported in Wrong Financial Year

Under Section 16(4), ITC for a financial year must be claimed by the earlier of the annual return filing date or 30 November of the following year. If you claimed ITC in the wrong financial year (e.g., an FY 2023-24 invoice claimed in FY 2024-25 GSTR-3B), the ITC mismatch may appear in the year where it was not available in GSTR-2B. Cross-financial year mismatches require careful documentation showing the invoice date, the period in which ITC was claimed, and the GSTR-2B in which it first appeared.

Step-by-Step: How to Respond to a GST Notice for ITC Mismatch

The response process involves eight steps from receiving the notice to final resolution. The total timeline ranges from 7 days (for simple mismatches resolved at the DRC-01A stage) to 45 days or more (for contested DRC-01 cases requiring personal hearings). Follow each step carefully to build a strong, well-documented response.

Step 1: Access and Analyse the Notice on the GST Portal

Log in to gst.gov.in with your GSTIN credentials. Navigate to Services > User Services > View Additional Notices and Orders. You will see a list of all notices issued to your GSTIN. Click on the relevant notice to open it. Download the notice PDF and note the following critical details: the notice reference number or DIN (Document Identification Number), the section under which it is issued (73 or 74), the specific tax periods covered, the ITC mismatch amount for each period (CGST, SGST, IGST separately), the proposed interest and penalty amounts, and the deadline for filing your reply. Create a response tracking sheet with these details. Also check the 'Case Details' tab to see if any prior correspondence (DRC-01A or ASMT-10) exists for the same issue.

Every GST notice must carry a valid Document Identification Number (DIN) as per CBIC Circular No. 128/47/2019-GST dated 23 December 2019. A notice without a valid DIN is considered non-existent in law. Verify the DIN on the CBIC portal at cbicddm.gov.in. If the notice does not carry a DIN or the DIN verification fails, include this as a preliminary objection in your reply.

Step 2: Download GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A, and GSTR-2B for Disputed Periods

For each tax period mentioned in the notice, download three sets of data from the GST portal. First, download your filed GSTR-3B showing the ITC claimed in Table 4 (eligible ITC broken into IGST, CGST, SGST, and cess). Second, download GSTR-2A for the same period, which is the dynamic auto-generated statement based on supplier filings. Third, download GSTR-2B, the static monthly statement that became the definitive ITC match document from January 2022 under Rule 36(4). Create a month-wise spreadsheet with columns for each data source. The difference between GSTR-3B Table 4 ITC and GSTR-2B available ITC is the mismatch amount the notice addresses. Confirm that the mismatch in your reconciliation matches the amount stated in the notice.

Step 3: Categorize Each Mismatch into Resolution Buckets

After identifying the invoice-level differences, sort each mismatch into one of these four categories:

CategoryDescriptionResolution ApproachTypical Outcome
Timing DifferenceITC claimed in one month but reflected in GSTR-2B of another monthShow cumulative reconciliation proving net-zero difference over the yearOfficer accepts the explanation; no demand
Supplier ErrorSupplier filed GSTR-1 with wrong GSTIN, invoice number, or amountSupplier amends GSTR-1; provide supplier confirmation letterOfficer accepts if supplier correction is verified
Supplier Non-FilingSupplier collected GST but did not file GSTR-1Provide invoices, payment proof, goods receipt; cite Section 16(2)(a) complianceVaries; may still demand reversal per Section 16(2)(c)
Genuine OverclaimITC claimed on blocked items (Section 17(5)), ineligible invoices, or wrong amountsAccept and pay through DRC-03 with interestAdmitted amount settled; penalty waived if paid early

Categorization is crucial because the legal arguments, supporting evidence, and practical outcomes differ for each bucket. Timing differences and supplier errors are the strongest positions for the taxpayer. Supplier non-filing cases are more contentious because of the Section 16(2)(c) condition. Genuine overclaims should be admitted and paid immediately to reduce penalty exposure under Section 73(5) or 73(8).

Based on our experience handling GST notice responses, we recommend addressing the categories in this specific order in your reply: (1) Timing differences first (easiest to prove with documents); (2) Supplier errors next (provable with supplier communication); (3) Admitted overclaims (pay through DRC-03 immediately); (4) Supplier non-filing last (requires detailed legal arguments). This order builds credibility with the officer by showing you have analysed every line item honestly.

Step 4: Gather Supporting Documents for Each Disputed Invoice

Strong documentation is the foundation of a successful response. For each invoice contributing to the mismatch, collect the following documents and organise them in a numbered annexure format:

  1. Original purchase invoice -- The tax invoice issued by the supplier with all mandatory fields (supplier GSTIN, buyer GSTIN, HSN/SAC code, tax rate, tax amount). This proves the transaction occurred and ITC was legitimately claimed based on a valid document.
  2. Proof of payment -- Bank statement, NEFT/RTGS receipt, or cancelled cheque showing payment to the supplier. This addresses the Section 16(2)(b) condition (receipt of goods or services) and demonstrates the commercial reality of the transaction.
  3. Goods receipt note or delivery challan -- For goods, the receipt note proves you actually received the supplies. For services, the service completion report or work order serves the same purpose.
  4. GSTR-2B extract showing the specific invoice -- If the invoice is now reflected in a subsequent GSTR-2B (timing difference), print the relevant GSTR-2B page highlighting the invoice. This directly proves the ITC is now available.
  5. Supplier communication -- Email, letter, or WhatsApp messages requesting the supplier to file their pending GSTR-1 or correct errors. This shows you took reasonable steps to resolve the mismatch at the source.
  6. Supplier's GSTR-1 amendment proof -- If the supplier has already corrected the error, obtain a copy of their amended GSTR-1 or a screenshot from their portal showing the amendment.

Step 5: Draft the Reply with a Reconciliation Statement

Your written reply should follow a structured format that addresses every point in the notice. Here is the recommended structure based on successful replies we have drafted for clients:

Section 1: Preliminary information. State your GSTIN, legal name, the notice reference number, date of notice, and the section under which it was issued. Acknowledge receipt of the notice and confirm you are filing the reply within the prescribed time limit.

Section 2: Summary of mismatch. Present a consolidated table showing the total ITC claimed in GSTR-3B, total ITC in GSTR-2B, and the difference for each disputed tax period. Confirm or correct the mismatch figures stated in the notice.

Section 3: Category-wise explanation. For each of the four categories (timing difference, supplier error, supplier non-filing, genuine overclaim), provide: the total amount in that category, the number of invoices involved, the legal basis for your claim, and a cross-reference to the supporting documents in the annexures.

Section 4: Legal arguments. Cite relevant judicial precedents and CBIC circulars supporting your position. For timing differences, cite the principle that ITC eligibility should be assessed on a cumulative annual basis. For supplier non-filing cases, cite the Supreme Court's observations on the burden not falling entirely on the recipient. For genuine overclaims, state the amount you are paying through DRC-03 and request waiver of penalty under Section 73(5).

Section 5: Relief sought. Clearly state the relief you are requesting: full closure for timing differences and supplier errors, reduced demand for supplier non-filing cases, and acceptance of DRC-03 payment for overclaims with waiver of penalty.

Annexures. Attach: Annexure A (invoice-wise reconciliation statement), Annexure B (GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2B month-wise comparison), Annexure C (supporting documents organised invoice-wise), Annexure D (DRC-03 payment challan for admitted amounts), and Annexure E (supplier communication and amendment proof).

Need help drafting your GST notice reply? Our specialists prepare legally sound responses with complete annexures.

Talk to a GST Expert

Step 6: File DRC-06 Reply on the GST Portal

Once your reply and supporting documents are ready, file the response through Form DRC-06 on the GST portal. Log in to gst.gov.in, navigate to Services > User Services > My Applications, and find the case linked to your notice reference number. Click 'Reply' to open the DRC-06 form. Upload your written reply as a PDF in the main document field. The portal allows up to 8 attachments of 5 MB each; use these for annexures. If your documents exceed this limit, compress the PDFs or split annexures across multiple attachments. Add a brief summary of your response in the 'Remarks' text box (the portal has a character limit, so keep it concise). Select the verification option (DSC for companies and LLPs, EVC for others) and submit. Download the acknowledgement with the Application Reference Number (ARN) immediately after submission. This ARN is your proof of timely filing.

Step 7: Attend the Personal Hearing if Scheduled

After reviewing your DRC-06 reply, the officer may schedule a personal hearing, especially for cases involving: large mismatch amounts (typically above ₹5 lakh), supplier non-filing issues where the legal position is debatable, cases where the officer disagrees with your categorization, or cases under Section 74 (fraud allegations). The hearing notice specifies the date, time, and mode (virtual or in-person). Prepare for the hearing by:

  1. Carry all original documents -- The officer may ask to inspect original invoices, bank statements, and goods receipt notes referenced in your DRC-06 reply.
  2. Prepare a summary presentation -- Create a one-page summary table showing the total mismatch, your category-wise reconciliation, and the amount you have already paid through DRC-03.
  3. Anticipate officer questions -- Officers typically ask: why did you claim ITC before verifying GSTR-2B? What steps did you take to ensure supplier compliance? Can you prove the actual receipt of goods?
  4. Bring your authorised representative -- A CA or tax consultant representing you at the hearing can present technical arguments more effectively, especially for complex legal points.

If you cannot attend on the scheduled date, submit a written adjournment request on the portal at least 3 days before the hearing. Officers typically grant one adjournment; repeated adjournment requests may lead to an adverse inference.

The officer is required to record the proceedings of the personal hearing in the order sheet. Verify that your key arguments and document submissions are noted in the hearing minutes. Request a copy of the hearing minutes for your records. If the officer issues an adverse order later, the hearing minutes serve as evidence that you presented your case. Any argument not recorded in the minutes may be difficult to rely on during appeal.

Step 8: Handle DRC-07 Demand Order or Close the Case

After considering your DRC-06 reply and personal hearing submissions, the officer passes an order. If the officer accepts your explanations, the case is closed with a favourable order and no further action is required from your side. If the officer partially or fully rejects your reply, a demand order is issued in Form DRC-07 specifying the confirmed tax demand, interest under Section 50, and penalty under Section 73 or 74.

Upon receiving DRC-07, you have three options: (1) Pay the confirmed demand within 3 months if you accept the order. (2) File an appeal via Form APL-01 before the Appellate Authority within 3 months of the DRC-07 date. (3) For partial acceptance, pay the admitted amount and appeal only the disputed portion. The appeal route requires a mandatory pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount (not including interest and penalty) before filing APL-01.

Penalties and Interest Structure for ITC Mismatch

The financial impact of an ITC mismatch notice depends on which section the proceedings are initiated under, whether you respond within the prescribed time, and whether you pay the admitted amount voluntarily. Understanding the penalty and interest framework helps you calculate the worst-case and best-case financial exposure.

ScenarioSectionPenaltyInterestTotal Exposure (on ₹1 Lakh Demand)
Pay full amount before SCN issuanceSection 73(5)No penalty18% p.a. from original due date₹1 Lakh + interest only
Pay within 30 days of SCN (DRC-01)Section 73(8)No penalty18% p.a. from original due date₹1 Lakh + interest only
Demand confirmed after adjudication (non-fraud)Section 73(9)10% of tax or ₹10,000 (higher)18% p.a. from original due date₹1 Lakh + ₹10,000 penalty + interest
Demand confirmed after adjudication (fraud)Section 74(9)100% of tax18% p.a. (24% for ITC fraud under Section 50(3))₹1 Lakh + ₹1 Lakh penalty + higher interest
Pay within 30 days of DRC-07 order (non-fraud)Section 73(11)10% of tax or ₹10,000 (higher)18% p.a.₹1 Lakh + ₹10,000 + interest
Pay within 30 days of DRC-07 order (fraud)Section 74(11)50% of tax (reduced)18% p.a.₹1 Lakh + ₹50,000 + interest

Based on our experience with GST notice responses, the most effective way to minimise financial exposure is to pay the admitted portion of the demand through DRC-03 before the DRC-01 SCN is issued (Section 73(5) benefit: zero penalty on admitted amount). For the disputed portion, file a strong DRC-06 reply with documentation. This dual strategy ensures you pay no penalty on the amount you accept while preserving your right to contest the balance.

Use the GST Penalty Calculator to estimate your specific penalty exposure based on the demand amount, section invoked, and the number of days of delay. Interest calculation requires the original GSTR-3B due date for each tax period, so compute it period-wise for accuracy.

Section 73 vs Section 74: Determining Which Applies to Your Case

Section 73 of the CGST Act applies when the ITC mismatch is due to reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. This covers genuine reconciliation errors, timing differences, vendor non-compliance, and inadvertent overclaims. The officer must issue the SCN at least 3 months before the limitation period expires (3 years from the annual return due date). The penalty is limited to 10% of the confirmed demand or ₹10,000, whichever is higher.

Section 74 of the CGST Act applies when the department alleges that the ITC mismatch resulted from fraud, wilful misstatement, or deliberate suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. The limitation period is 5 years from the annual return due date. The penalty is 100% of the confirmed tax amount, making the total exposure double the tax demand plus interest. Section 74 proceedings are initiated when the department has evidence of: fake invoices without actual supply, circular trading for ITC generation, fraudulent entities created solely for ITC claims, or deliberate suppression of turnover requiring higher ITC reversal.

If you believe the notice wrongly invokes Section 74 when Section 73 should apply (i.e., the mismatch is a genuine error, not fraud), make this a primary argument in your DRC-06 reply. Demonstrate that: you maintained proper books of accounts, filed all returns on time, the mismatch arose from reconciliation complexity or supplier defaults, and you had no intent to evade tax. The burden of proving fraud or suppression lies on the department under Section 74, although the practical standard can be demanding in contested cases.

A confirmed Section 74 order carries consequences beyond the immediate penalty. It may trigger prosecution proceedings under Section 132 if the tax amount exceeds ₹5 crore (reduced from ₹5 crore to ₹2 crore for certain offences). It also affects your compliance rating, making your GSTIN subject to increased scrutiny. If you receive a Section 74 notice, consult a qualified GST consultant or advocate immediately before filing any response.

Time Limits for Responding to GST Notices

Missing a response deadline in GST proceedings has direct consequences: the officer can pass an ex-parte order confirming the full demand without considering your defence. Tracking deadlines accurately and filing responses on time is the most basic yet critical aspect of managing a GST notice.

Notice TypeResponse DeadlineExtension Available?Consequence of Missing Deadline
DRC-01A (Intimation)No statutory deadline; typically 15 to 30 days given in the noticeInformal; request by writing to the officerOfficer proceeds to issue formal DRC-01 SCN
ASMT-10 (Scrutiny Notice)30 days from date of serviceYes; submit written request before deadlineOfficer may accept the mismatch as confirmed and initiate Section 73/74 proceedings
DRC-01 (Show Cause Notice)30 days from date of serviceYes; submit written request before deadlineEx-parte demand order (DRC-07) confirming full tax, interest, and penalty
Personal Hearing NoticeDate specified in the noticeYes; written adjournment request at least 3 days in advanceAdverse inference; officer may proceed without hearing you
DRC-07 (Demand Order)3 months for appeal via APL-01Condonation up to 1 additional month by Appellate AuthorityDemand becomes final; recovery proceedings initiated

The 30-day deadline for DRC-01 and ASMT-10 is counted from the date of service of the notice. For notices served on the GST portal, the date of service is the date the notice is made available on the portal (visible in your dashboard). For manually served notices, the date of service is the date of delivery at your registered address or principal place of business. Always verify the service date and compute your deadline accurately.

Filing an Appeal Against DRC-07 Demand Order

If the adjudicating officer passes an adverse order in DRC-07 and you believe the order is incorrect (either on facts or law), you can challenge it through the GST appellate process. The first appeal is before the Appellate Authority (typically the Joint Commissioner or Additional Commissioner); the second appeal is before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT). Here is the complete appeal process.

Step 1: Calculate the Pre-Deposit Amount

Before filing APL-01, you must deposit 10% of the disputed tax amount (excluding interest and penalty) through the electronic cash ledger. For example, if the DRC-07 order confirms a demand of ₹10 lakh (tax) plus ₹1.8 lakh (interest) plus ₹1 lakh (penalty), the pre-deposit is ₹1 lakh (10% of ₹10 lakh tax). The remaining 90% of tax plus interest and penalty is stayed during the pendency of the appeal. Pay the pre-deposit before filing APL-01; the portal will not accept the appeal without it.

Step 2: Prepare and File Form APL-01

File APL-01 on the GST portal within 3 months of the DRC-07 order date. If you miss the 3-month deadline, the Appellate Authority can condone a delay of up to 1 additional month upon showing sufficient cause. Navigate to Services > User Services > My Applications > Appeal to Appellate Authority on the portal. Enter the order number, date, and the grounds of appeal. Upload a detailed appeal memorandum covering: statement of facts, grounds of appeal (legal and factual), relief sought, and supporting documents. The appeal memorandum should address each finding in the DRC-07 order and explain why it is incorrect.

Step 3: Appellate Authority Proceedings

The Appellate Authority reviews the DRC-07 order, your APL-01 appeal, and the department's response. A personal hearing is almost always granted at the appellate stage. The Appellate Authority can: confirm the order (dismiss appeal), modify the order (reduce or increase demand), or set aside the order entirely (allow appeal). The Appellate Authority must pass an order within one year of filing, although delays are common. If the appeal is decided in your favour, the pre-deposit is refunded with interest at 6% per annum from the date of deposit.

Need Help Filing a GST Appeal?

Our GST litigation team handles APL-01 drafting, pre-deposit calculation, and appellate representation.

Get Appeal Assistance

Documents Required for ITC Mismatch Reply

A well-documented reply is the difference between a successful closure and an adverse demand order. Organise your documents in a structured annexure format that the officer can easily navigate. Here is the complete document checklist for an ITC mismatch notice response.

Mandatory Documents

  1. Copy of the GST notice -- DRC-01, DRC-01A, or ASMT-10 received from the portal, with DIN verification
  2. GSTR-3B for disputed periods -- Showing ITC claimed in Table 4 for each month mentioned in the notice
  3. GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B for disputed periods -- Downloaded from the GST portal showing available ITC for comparison
  4. Invoice-wise reconciliation statement -- Spreadsheet matching every invoice between GSTR-3B claims and GSTR-2B availability with variance explanation
  5. Purchase invoices -- Copies of all invoices for which ITC is disputed, showing supplier GSTIN, HSN/SAC, tax amount, and invoice number
  6. Payment proof -- Bank statements, NEFT/RTGS receipts, or UPI transaction records confirming payments to the supplier
  7. DRC-03 payment challan -- If you have voluntarily reversed any admitted overclaim, attach the challan as proof of payment

Supporting Documents (Strengthen Your Reply)

  1. Goods receipt notes or delivery challans -- Proving actual receipt of supplies for goods transactions
  2. E-way bill copies -- For goods worth more than ₹50,000, the e-way bill proves the movement of goods
  3. Supplier communication -- Letters, emails, or messages requesting suppliers to file or amend their GSTR-1
  4. Supplier confirmation letter -- Written confirmation from the supplier acknowledging the transaction and the pending return filing
  5. ITC reversal register -- Internal register showing all ITC reversals made during the year under Rules 37, 42, 43, and Section 17(5)
  6. Relevant judicial precedents -- High Court or Tribunal decisions supporting your legal position on ITC eligibility

Best Practices to Prevent ITC Mismatch Notices

Prevention is significantly less expensive than responding to notices. Implementing these practices reduces ITC mismatches at the source and builds a compliance track record that works in your favour if a notice is eventually issued.

Monthly GSTR-2B Reconciliation

Do not wait until the annual return to reconcile ITC. After each month's GSTR-2B is generated (14th of the following month), compare it with your purchase register within 5 working days. Identify mismatches immediately and take corrective action: contact suppliers, request GSTR-1 amendments, or hold ITC claims in GSTR-3B until the invoice reflects in GSTR-2B. Monthly reconciliation converts potential annual mismatches into monthly operational tasks that are far easier to manage. Use the GST Calculator to verify tax computations on individual invoices during reconciliation.

Vendor Compliance Monitoring

Track your suppliers' GST return filing status regularly. The GST portal allows you to check whether a supplier's GSTIN is active and whether their returns are filed. Create a vendor compliance tracker listing all major suppliers (those contributing more than ₹50,000 of annual ITC) with their return filing status. Send monthly reminders to non-compliant suppliers. For persistent non-filers, consider switching to compliant vendors or adjusting commercial terms to account for the ITC risk. Some businesses deduct the ITC amount from supplier payments until the supplier files GSTR-1 and the ITC reflects in GSTR-2B.

Claiming ITC Only After GSTR-2B Verification

The safest approach is to claim ITC in GSTR-3B only for invoices that already appear in your GSTR-2B for that month. This creates a zero-mismatch filing practice. Any invoices that do not appear in GSTR-2B are kept in a separate "pending ITC" register and claimed only in the month when they reflect. While this approach may delay some ITC claims by a month or two, it eliminates virtually all mismatch notices. For businesses with a large number of suppliers, automated reconciliation tools can flag GSTR-2B-matched and unmatched invoices before each GSTR-3B filing.

Based on our experience advising 2,500+ GST-registered businesses, firms that automate GSTR-2B reconciliation with their accounting software reduce ITC mismatch notices by over 80%. Accounting platforms like Tally, Zoho Books, and ClearTax offer GSTR-2B auto-reconciliation features. The investment in a reconciliation tool (₹5,000 to ₹25,000 per year) is substantially lower than the cost of responding to even a single ITC mismatch notice (₹5,000 to ₹50,000 in professional fees plus potential demand).

Maintaining Complete Invoice Documentation

Store every purchase invoice with its corresponding payment proof, goods receipt note, and e-way bill (where applicable) in a systematic filing system, either digital or physical. The documentation must be accessible within 48 hours of a notice because the 30-day window goes fast when you are collecting documents from multiple departments. Maintain invoice records for at least 7 years from the date of the annual return, as per the record retention requirements under Section 35 and Section 36 of the CGST Act.

Common Mistakes When Responding to GST ITC Mismatch Notices

Drawing from our experience handling thousands of GST notice responses, these are the errors that most frequently lead to adverse orders or increased financial exposure. Avoid these to improve your chances of a favourable outcome.

Mistake 1: Ignoring the Notice or Delaying the Response

The single biggest mistake is not responding within the 30-day deadline. Some taxpayers ignore notices hoping the department will drop the matter, or they delay gathering documents. An ex-parte order is almost always worse than any order passed after considering the taxpayer's reply. Even if your documents are incomplete, file a preliminary reply within the deadline acknowledging the notice and requesting additional time to compile the full response. A partial response is infinitely better than no response.

Mistake 2: Blanket Denial Without Evidence

Replying with a generic statement like "all ITC claims are correct" without invoice-level reconciliation and supporting documents weakens your case. Officers expect specific, data-backed responses for each line item in the notice. A reply that addresses each invoice with evidence (even if the evidence is that the supplier has been contacted and has committed to amend their GSTR-1) is far more persuasive than a blanket denial.

Mistake 3: Not Paying the Admitted Amount Through DRC-03

If your reconciliation reveals that some ITC was genuinely overclaimed (blocked credits, invoices without actual supply, duplicate claims), pay that portion immediately through DRC-03. Disputing the entire amount when part of it is clearly an overclaim damages your credibility. The officer is more likely to accept your explanations for the disputed portion if you demonstrate honesty about the admitted portion. Under Section 73(5), paying the admitted amount before the SCN date eliminates penalty on that amount.

A factual reply without legal backing is incomplete. Reference specific sections of the CGST Act, relevant Rules, CBIC circulars, and High Court or Tribunal decisions that support your position. For supplier non-filing cases, cite the constitutional principle that the recipient should not bear the burden of the supplier's non-compliance, supported by developing jurisprudence in various High Courts. For timing differences, cite the circular on ITC reconciliation at the annual level.

Mistake 5: Failing to Follow Up After Filing DRC-06

Filing DRC-06 is not the end of the process. Track the case status on the GST portal regularly. If the officer has queries, they will communicate through the portal, and your response deadline runs from the date of that communication. Missing a supplementary query from the officer after filing DRC-06 is equivalent to not responding at all. Set calendar reminders to check your GST portal dashboard weekly until the case is resolved.

After you file DRC-06, the officer may issue additional queries or requests for specific documents through the portal under the same case reference. These appear as new entries in your 'View Additional Notices and Orders' section. Check your GST portal every week after filing DRC-06. Some officers also send hearing notices with short lead times (5 to 7 days). Missing a hearing notice because you did not check the portal is a common and avoidable mistake.

ITC Mismatch Resolution: Process Flowchart

The complete lifecycle of an ITC mismatch notice follows a defined path from initial intimation to final resolution. Understanding this flow helps you anticipate the next step and prepare accordingly.

  1. System flags ITC mismatch -- GST common portal detects GSTR-3B ITC exceeding GSTR-2B
  2. DRC-01A issued -- Officer sends pre-SCN intimation with opportunity to pay voluntarily
  3. Taxpayer responds to DRC-01A -- Pay admitted amount via DRC-03 or submit explanation
  4. If unresolved, ASMT-10 or DRC-01 issued -- Formal notice with 30-day deadline
  5. Taxpayer files DRC-06 -- Reply with reconciliation, documents, and legal arguments
  6. Officer reviews reply -- May accept, reject, or schedule personal hearing
  7. Personal hearing (if scheduled) -- Present documents and arguments in person or virtually
  8. Order passed -- Favourable order (closure) or adverse order (DRC-07 demand)
  9. If adverse, file APL-01 -- Appeal within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit
  10. Appellate Authority decides -- Confirm, modify, or set aside the order

Summary

Responding to a GST notice for ITC mismatch requires a systematic approach: download the notice from the GST portal, reconcile GSTR-3B with GSTR-2B at the invoice level, categorize each mismatch (timing difference, supplier error, supplier non-filing, or genuine overclaim), gather supporting documents, and file DRC-06 within 30 days. Pay any admitted overclaim immediately through DRC-03 to eliminate penalty under Section 73(5). If a demand order (DRC-07) is issued, file APL-01 within 3 months with a 10% pre-deposit of disputed tax. The best defence against ITC mismatch notices is monthly GSTR-2B reconciliation and proactive vendor compliance monitoring. For ongoing compliance management, explore our annual compliance services.

GST Notice Response and Compliance Support

Our GST experts handle the complete notice response process, from reconciliation to DRC-06 filing and personal hearing representation, starting at ₹5,000.

Get Expert GST Support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a GST notice for ITC mismatch?
A GST notice for ITC mismatch is a formal communication from the GST department issued when Input Tax Credit claimed in your GSTR-3B exceeds the ITC available in GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B. The notice asks you to explain the discrepancy and provide supporting documents. Common notice forms include DRC-01 (Show Cause Notice), DRC-01A (intimation), and ASMT-10 (discrepancy notice).
What is DRC-01 in GST?
DRC-01 is the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued under Section 73 or Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017. It demands the taxpayer to show cause why the disputed tax amount, along with applicable interest and penalty, should not be recovered. DRC-01 is issued after the officer forms a preliminary opinion that ITC has been wrongly availed. You get 30 days to reply via Form DRC-06.
What is ASMT-10 notice in GST?
ASMT-10 is a notice for discrepancy in returns issued under Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017. The GST officer issues ASMT-10 when a scrutiny of your return reveals differences between your GSTR-3B ITC claims and the data available in GSTR-2A/2B. You must respond within 30 days explaining the discrepancy or paying the differential tax with interest.
What is DRC-01A notice in GST?
DRC-01A is an intimation notice issued before a formal Show Cause Notice (DRC-01). It gives the taxpayer an opportunity to pay the tax, interest, and penalty voluntarily before the officer initiates formal proceedings. Responding to DRC-01A promptly by paying the admitted amount or clarifying the mismatch can prevent escalation to DRC-01 and reduce penalty exposure.
What is DRC-07 demand order?
DRC-07 is the final demand order issued by the GST officer after adjudicating the Show Cause Notice. If the officer rejects your reply to DRC-01 and confirms the tax demand, the order is passed in DRC-07 specifying the tax, interest, and penalty payable. You can file an appeal via APL-01 within 3 months of receiving DRC-07 before the Appellate Authority.
Why does the GST department issue ITC mismatch notices?
The GST department issues ITC mismatch notices when automated comparison between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/2B reveals that a taxpayer claimed more ITC than what is reflected in supplier-uploaded data. The system flags mismatches exceeding threshold amounts specified in departmental instructions. Officers then verify whether the excess ITC was legitimately claimed or wrongly availed.
What is the difference between Section 73 and Section 74 for ITC mismatch?
Section 73 applies when the ITC mismatch is not due to fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts; the penalty is 10% of tax or ₹10,000 (whichever is higher). Section 74 applies when fraud or deliberate suppression is involved; the penalty is 100% of the tax amount. Section 73 proceedings are more common for genuine ITC mismatches.
Can I receive a GST notice for a small ITC mismatch?
Yes, but the GST department typically focuses on material mismatches exceeding ₹25,000 to ₹50,000 per tax period, based on internal thresholds set by CBIC instructions. Smaller differences of a few hundred rupees are usually not scrutinised individually. However, if small mismatches persist across multiple months, the cumulative difference may trigger a consolidated notice for the full financial year.
How do I respond to a GST notice for ITC mismatch?
To respond: (1) Download the notice from the GST portal; (2) Compare GSTR-3B ITC with GSTR-2A/2B month-wise; (3) Categorize mismatches (timing, supplier error, overclaim); (4) Gather invoice copies, payment proof, and supplier communications; (5) Draft a reply with a reconciliation statement; (6) File DRC-06 on the portal within 30 days.
How do I file DRC-06 reply on the GST portal?
Log in to gst.gov.in, go to Services > User Services > My Applications, and select the case linked to your notice. Click 'Reply', upload your written reply PDF, reconciliation statement, and supporting documents (maximum 8 attachments of 5 MB each). Add remarks in the text box summarising your response. Sign using DSC or EVC and submit. Download the ARN acknowledgement.
What is the time limit to reply to DRC-01?
You get 30 days from the date of service of the DRC-01 notice to file your reply via Form DRC-06 on the GST portal. If you need additional time, submit a written request for extension to the issuing officer before the deadline expires. The officer may grant a reasonable extension, but this is discretionary and not guaranteed.
What is the time limit to reply to ASMT-10?
The time limit to respond to ASMT-10 is 30 days from the date of service of the notice. Your reply must explain the discrepancy in returns or confirm acceptance of the mismatch and pay the differential tax with interest. If you fail to respond within 30 days, the officer may initiate formal proceedings under Section 73 or Section 74.
What happens if I do not respond to a GST ITC mismatch notice?
Non-response to a GST notice leads to ex-parte adjudication, where the officer decides based on available records without hearing your side. For DRC-01, the officer passes a demand order (DRC-07) confirming the full tax, interest at 18% per annum, and maximum penalty. For ASMT-10, the officer may escalate proceedings to a full Show Cause Notice under Section 73 or 74.
Do I need a CA or tax consultant to respond to a GST notice?
While not legally mandatory, hiring a CA or GST consultant is strongly recommended for notices involving ITC mismatches above ₹1 lakh. Professionals understand the legal provisions, draft technically sound replies referencing specific Sections and Rules, and represent you during personal hearings. At IncorpX, our GST experts handle notice responses starting at ₹5,000.
What is a personal hearing in GST proceedings?
A personal hearing is an opportunity granted by the adjudicating officer for the taxpayer (or their authorised representative) to present arguments verbally before the order is passed. The officer schedules the hearing after reviewing your DRC-06 reply. You can attend virtually or in-person, present additional evidence, and clarify complex points that the written reply may not fully convey.
What is the penalty for ITC mismatch under GST?
Under Section 73 (non-fraud cases), the penalty is 10% of the confirmed tax demand or ₹10,000, whichever is higher. Under Section 74 (fraud or wilful misstatement), the penalty is 100% of the tax amount. Additionally, interest at 18% per annum under Section 50 applies on the confirmed tax demand from the due date of the original return.
How much interest is charged on ITC mismatch demand?
Interest on confirmed ITC mismatch demand is charged at 18% per annum under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act. Interest is calculated from the due date of filing the original GSTR-3B return for the relevant tax period until the date of actual payment. For example, a ₹1 lakh mismatch for a return due on 20 July 2024, paid on 20 January 2026, attracts approximately ₹27,000 in interest.
What is the pre-deposit required for filing a GST appeal?
To file an appeal against a DRC-07 demand order, you must pay a mandatory pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount (not including interest and penalty) before filing Form APL-01. For a second appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, an additional 20% pre-deposit is required. The pre-deposit is adjustable against the final order if the appeal is decided in your favour.
How much does a GST consultant charge for notice response?
Professional fees for responding to a GST ITC mismatch notice range from ₹5,000 to ₹50,000 depending on the complexity and amount in dispute. Simple mismatches under ₹5 lakh typically cost ₹5,000 to ₹15,000. Complex cases involving multiple tax periods, large amounts, or fraud allegations (Section 74) cost ₹15,000 to ₹50,000. Personal hearing representation is often charged separately.
DRC-01 vs ASMT-10: what is the difference?
ASMT-10 is a scrutiny notice issued under Section 61 to flag discrepancies; it is less severe and gives you a chance to explain before formal proceedings. DRC-01 is a Show Cause Notice issued under Section 73 or 74 demanding tax, interest, and penalty; it initiates formal adjudication. Responding well to ASMT-10 can prevent escalation to DRC-01.
Section 73 vs Section 74: which applies to ITC mismatch?
Section 73 applies to most ITC mismatches where the excess claim is due to genuine errors, timing differences, or reconciliation gaps with no intent to evade tax. Section 74 applies when the department alleges fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts. Section 73 carries lower penalties and a longer limitation period (3 years vs 5 years under Section 74).
GSTR-2A vs GSTR-2B: which is used for ITC mismatch comparison?
GSTR-2B is the primary document used for ITC mismatch verification since January 2022 under Rule 36(4). GSTR-2B is a static monthly statement generated on the 14th of each month, while GSTR-2A is dynamic and changes as suppliers amend their GSTR-1. The GST department compares your GSTR-3B ITC claims against GSTR-2B for issuing mismatch notices.
DRC-06 vs APL-01: when to use which form?
DRC-06 is the reply form filed in response to a Show Cause Notice (DRC-01) during the adjudication stage, before an order is passed. APL-01 is the appeal form filed after a demand order (DRC-07) has been issued, challenging the order before the Appellate Authority. File DRC-06 first; use APL-01 only if the DRC-07 order goes against you.
What are the common reasons for ITC mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2B?
The top reasons for ITC mismatch are: (1) Supplier not filing GSTR-1, so invoices do not appear in GSTR-2B; (2) Supplier filing GSTR-1 with wrong buyer GSTIN; (3) Invoice details mismatch (amount, date, or invoice number); (4) Claiming ITC in a different tax period than when it appears in GSTR-2B; (5) Claiming blocked ITC under Section 17(5).
Can I claim ITC if the supplier has not filed GSTR-1?
Under the current rules (Rule 36(4)), you can claim ITC only to the extent it is reflected in your GSTR-2B. If a supplier has not filed GSTR-1, the corresponding ITC will not appear in GSTR-2B, and you cannot claim it in GSTR-3B. Follow up with the supplier to file their pending return. Once filed, the ITC appears in the next GSTR-2B cycle and you can claim it in that period's GSTR-3B.
How do I handle timing differences in ITC mismatch notices?
Timing differences occur when you claim ITC in one month but the supplier's invoice reflects in GSTR-2B for a different month. To handle this: (1) Prepare a period-wise reconciliation showing the invoice appeared in a subsequent GSTR-2B; (2) Demonstrate that the net ITC over the financial year matches; (3) Attach both months' GSTR-2B as proof. Timing differences are legitimate and officers typically accept this explanation.
What if ITC mismatch is due to supplier's error in GSTR-1?
If the supplier entered a wrong GSTIN, invoice number, or amount in their GSTR-1, your ITC will be mismatched. Steps: (1) Contact the supplier with specific error details; (2) Request an amendment in their next GSTR-1 filing; (3) Obtain a written confirmation from the supplier acknowledging the error; (4) Attach the supplier communication and the corrected GSTR-2B in your reply.
Can I voluntarily reverse excess ITC to avoid penalty?
Yes. You can reverse excess ITC by paying the amount through Form DRC-03 (voluntary payment) on the GST portal before or after receiving a notice. Voluntary reversal before the Show Cause Notice reduces penalty exposure. Under Section 73(5), if you pay the tax and interest within 30 days of the SCN, no penalty is levied. Under Section 73(8), payment before the SCN closes the matter entirely.
How does Section 16(2) affect ITC mismatch notices?
Section 16(2) prescribes four conditions for claiming ITC: possession of tax invoice, receipt of goods or services, tax actually paid to the government by the supplier, and filing of the return. If any condition is not met, the ITC is ineligible. Officers cite Section 16(2)(c) for ITC mismatch cases where the supplier collected GST but did not file returns or pay to the government.
Can the GST officer issue a notice for ITC mismatch from a previous year?
Yes. Under Section 73 (non-fraud), the officer can issue a notice within 3 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Under Section 74 (fraud), the limitation is 5 years. For example, for FY 2022-23, a Section 73 notice can be issued until December 2026 (3 years from the GSTR-9 due date of December 2023).
What is the role of Form DRC-03 in ITC mismatch cases?
DRC-03 is the voluntary payment form used to deposit tax, interest, or penalty voluntarily. In ITC mismatch cases, you file DRC-03 to: (1) Pay admitted tax before SCN issuance to close the matter under Section 73(5); (2) Reverse genuinely excess ITC identified during your reconciliation; (3) Pay the admitted portion of demand while disputing the balance. DRC-03 is filed on the GST portal under Services > User Services.
What happens at the GST Appellate Tribunal for ITC mismatch disputes?
If the first appeal before the Appellate Authority (APL-01) is rejected, you can file a second appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) via Form APL-03. The Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body that re-examines both facts and law. An additional pre-deposit of 20% of disputed tax is required. The Tribunal must decide within one year of filing. Further appeals on questions of law go to the High Court.
Tags:

Need Help With This Process?

Our experts are ready to assist you every step of the way. Get started with a free consultation today!

D

Dhanush Prabha is the Chief Technology Officer and Chief Marketing Officer at IncorpX, where he leads product engineering, platform architecture, and data-driven growth strategy. With over half a decade of experience in full-stack development, scalable systems design, and performance marketing, he oversees the technical infrastructure and digital acquisition channels that power IncorpX. Dhanush specializes in building high-performance web applications, SEO and AEO-optimized content frameworks, marketing automation pipelines, and conversion-focused user experiences. He has architected and deployed multiple SaaS platforms, API-first applications, and enterprise-grade systems from the ground up. His writing spans technology, business registration, startup strategy, and digital transformation - offering clear, research-backed insights drawn from hands-on engineering and growth leadership. He is passionate about helping founders and professionals make informed decisions through practical, real-world content.Dhanush Prabha is the Chief Technology Officer and Chief Marketing Officer at IncorpX, where he leads product engineering, platform architecture, and data-driven growth strategy. With over half a decade of experience in full-stack development, scalable systems design, and performance marketing, he oversees the technical infrastructure and digital acquisition channels that power IncorpX. Dhanush specializes in building high-performance web applications, SEO and AEO-optimized content frameworks, marketing automation pipelines, and conversion-focused user experiences. He has architected and deployed multiple SaaS platforms, API-first applications, and enterprise-grade systems from the ground up. His writing spans technology, business registration, startup strategy, and digital transformation - offering clear, research-backed insights drawn from hands-on engineering and growth leadership. He is passionate about helping founders and professionals make informed decisions through practical, real-world content.